7.6.22 This is a 100-year geopolitical shift underway now, shared from a Russian perspective.
Martin Armstrong interview with Greg Hunter, basically saying a worldwide revolution can happen anytime and the cabal’s great reset will fail. American civil war very likely. Martin in another interview with more details on the coming shortages, as well as a financial video on forecasting the future according to cycles.
Along with the video, this blog post by Armstrong says that there will be global depopulation by 2032, and we will be “resetting” to a new world. Not the globalist one that the Davos cabal are pushing right now, but a clean slate based on business cycles. Exciting, and yet sobering and scary as well.
Metallicman with a pretty blackpill set of articles on how the Marxists in America will kill conservatives and take over. I personally believe the devolution plan will prevent this from happening, but it’s good to be aware of the alternative scenarios just in case. Yeah, this is a pretty big blackpill for me, reading the articles on how the Marxists plan to kill all conservatives and traditionalists. Hoo boy…
Food shortages – This is an interesting interactive map that shows all the fires and other “coincidences” that have been happening to our food related distribution, processing, and grocery stores. This is intentional, 100%.
6.18.22 – Cabal’s plans for us: this is a fantastic article that describes the great reset.
6.16.22 – Sanctions: I’ve never heard of Abby Martin, but this clip of her effectively states how the evil cabal uses the American goverment and its bankster allies to control the world. I’ve never more ashamed of the “good” America does in the name of democracy than now. This maniacal need to control other sovereign nations for the sake of demonic power needs to be stopped.
6.6.22 – Crumbling Western Civilization Foundations: I’d never ever thought to question the foundations upon which the west was built, but with the last days of this era upon us, I’m questioning everything as I want to look forward to see what a new world could look like. This comment, which links to a site that’s been blocked, is very interesting. Here’s the key theme I just learned.
The Anglo-American approach assumes that the ultimate measure of a society is its level of consumption. In the long run, List argued, a society’s well-being and its overall wealth are determined not by what the society can buy, but by what it can make (i.e. value coming from the real, self-sufficient economy). The German school argued that emphasizing consumption would eventually be self-defeating. It would bias the system away from wealth creation, and ultimately make it impossible to consume as much, or to employ so many.
List was prescient. He was right. This is the flaw now so clearly exposed in the Anglo model. One aggravated by subsequent massive financialisation that has led to a structure dominated by an ephemeral, derivative super-sphere that drained the West of its wealth-creating real economy, couriering its remains and its supply-lines ‘offshore’. Self-reliance has eroded, and the shrinking base of wealth creation supports an ever-smaller proportion of the population in adequately paid employment.
It is no longer ‘fit for purpose’ and is in crisis. That is widely understood at the upper reaches of the system. To acknowledge this however, would seem to go against the past two centuries of economics, narrated as one long progression toward Anglo-Saxon rationality and good sense. It lies at the root of the Anglo ‘story’.
Yet, financial crisis might upend that story entirely.
How so? Well, the liberal order rests on three pillars – on three interlocking, co-constituting pillars: Newton’s ‘laws’ were projected to lend the Anglo economic model its (dubious) claim to being founded in hard empirical laws – as if it were physics. Rousseau, Locke, and their followers elevated individualism as a political principle, and from Smith came the logic-core to the Anglo-American system: If each individual does what is best for him or her, the result will be what is best for the nation as a whole.
The most important thing about these pillars is their moral equivalence, as well as their interlocking connection. Knock out one pillar as invalid, and the whole edifice known as ‘European values’ comes adrift. Only through being locked together does it possess coherency.
And the unspoken fear amongst these western élites is that during this extended period of Anglo supremacy… there has always been an alternative school of thought to theirs. List was not concerned with the morality of consumption. Instead, he was interested in both strategic and material well-being. In strategic terms, nations ended up being dependent or sovereign according to their ability to make things for themselves.